Drop in the number. See what it leaves out.
Paste a lease cost schedule, utility bill, contractor quote, operating budget, or listing text. X-Ray detects recurring and one-time costs, compares recognized lines with the location model, surfaces missing layers, and flags escalation language worth checking.
Give the document economic context.
The location model is optional, but adding a real address lets ExpenseIntel compare detected cost lines against the same operating profile instead of auditing numbers in a vacuum.
What the document says vs. what the location may require.
This is a comparison layer, not a verdict. It is strongest when the pasted text clearly identifies amounts and billing cadence.
Which numbers deserve another look?
Recognized categories are compared with the current ExpenseIntel modeled layer where a like-for-like category exists. Unmatched lines remain visible instead of being forced into a false comparison.
| Detected line | Category | Cadence | Annualized | Model layer | Variance |
|---|
Missing cost layers are part of the answer.
A document can be internally correct and still be incomplete for the decision. X-Ray keeps likely location-cost layers visible when the pasted material never mentions them.
Missing does not mean the cost definitely applies. It means the pasted material did not clearly show the layer, so it is worth verifying before treating the document as all-in.
Find the sentence that changes the economics later.
X-Ray looks for percentage-based escalation language and material gaps against the modeled cost stack. These are review prompts, not legal conclusions.
Do not ask whether the quote is cheap. Ask what the quote forgot.Paste → detect → annualize → compare → expose the missing layer